Evolutionary statecraft

Evolutionary statecraft

by Cho-ying Li

Part of Collections of the Harvard University Archives

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
This research examines the evolution of statecraft in the field of hydrological management by focusing on the roles of the Ming state and local elites in administrative coordination, regulation of funding and corvée, and formulation of hydrological knowledge. The three-phase evolution of hydrological management over the course of the Ming dynasty, which this research adopts, is based on the analysis of local gazetteers, literary works of bureaucrats and local elites, and hydrological specialists' books. A common characteristic in all these phases is the active role of the local elite, particularly in their sophisticated appeals for the state to be more active and proactive in maintaining good hydrological conditions. In the first phase (1360s-1450s), the state was not required to pay the people for their work on hydrological management. It was relatively easy for officials to launch large and routine projects. In the second phase (1460s-1570s), a shared view was that regional-scale hydrological management was necessary to keep the condition in good shape, and that furthermore it required the supervision of a regional hydrological authority. Since paying the public had become a noun, bureaucrats and local elites developed a variety of strategies to stabilize funding. Another important experiment was the "head land system" and the expansion of "mobilization based on landownership" to secure labor. The need to achieve effective use of funding and labor led to a critical development: the systematization of hydrological understanding. In the third and final phase (1570s-1640s), localization of hydrological management emerged as an important alternative to the "regional-scale hydrological management." Although the regional-scale approach, after one-century experiment, was eventually abandoned, this research shows that the consensus reached among bureaucrats and local elites during the second phase--that is, those who benefited should bear the cost, or the "principle of benefit"--built a sold foundation for them in this final phase to manage hydrological matters without the intervention of higher authorities.

Discuss Evolutionary statecraft with other readers

Join or start a book club for Evolutionary statecraft on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Evolutionary statecraft?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Evolutionary statecraft as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Evolutionary statecraft with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Evolutionary statecraft with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.