Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO

Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO

by Thomas M. Nichols, Jeffrey D. McCausland, Douglas T. Stuart

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

2 readers worldwide want to read this book

Start a club free
About
"NATO has been a "nuclear" alliance since its inception. Nuclear weapons have served the dual purpose of being part of NATO military planning as well as being central to the Alliance's deterrence strategy. For over 4 decades, NATO allies sought to find conventional and nuclear forces, doctrines, and agreed strategies that linked the defense of Europe to that of the United States. Still, in light of the evolving security situation, the Alliance must now consider the role and future of tactical or non-strategic nuclear weapons (NSNWs). Two clear conclusions emerge from this analysis. First, in the more than 2 decades since the end of the Cold War, the problem itself -- that is, the question of what to do with weapons designed in a previous century for the possibility of a World War III against a military alliance that no longer exists -- is understudied, both inside and outside of government. Tactical weapons, although less awesome than their strategic siblings, carry significant security and political risks, and they have not received the attention that is commensurate to their importance. Second, it is clear that whatever the future of these arms, the status quo is unacceptable. It is past the time for NATO to make more resolute decisions, find a coherent strategy, and formulate more definite plans about its nuclear status. Consequently, decisions about the role of nuclear weapons within the Alliance and the associated supporting analysis are fundamental to the future identity of NATO. At the Lisbon Summit in Portugal in November 2010, the Alliance agreed to conduct the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review (DDPR). This effort is designed to answer these difficult questions prior to the upcoming NATO Summit in May 2012. The United States and its closest allies must define future threats and, in doing so, clarify NATO's identity, purpose, and corresponding force requirements. So far, NATO remains a "nuclear alliance," but it is increasingly hard to define what that means."--Publisher's website

Discuss Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO with other readers

Join or start a book club for Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.