Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival

Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival

by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Emilie Sela Zoltick, Harvard University

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
Background: The association between meat consumption and breast cancer risk and the relationship between vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk have been examined in numerous studies, but questions still remain. For colorectal cancer survival, research into diet has been sparse. Methods: Chapter one is a pooled analysis of 22 prospective cohort studies examining meat and egg consumption and breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status using Cox proportional hazards models to estimate study-specific relative risks which were then pooled using random effects models. Chapter two is a pooled analysis of 17 prospective cohort studies in which the relationship between prediagnostic circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and colorectal cancer risk was explored using conditional logistic regression to calculate study-specific relative risks which were then pooled using random effects models. In Chapter three, the association between pre- and post-diagnosis sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) and sugar intake and mortality among colorectal cancer patients was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models to estimate relative risks in two prospective cohort studies. Results: There were no significant associations between red and processed meat, seafood, and egg consumption and breast cancer risk, regardless of hormone receptor status. For poultry intake, there was a marginally statistically significant increased risk of ER+ and ER+PR- breast cancers only. We found that 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk, with significant decreased risks for levels beyond current recommendations. These inverse associations were stronger in women than men. Pre-diagnosis total fructose, glucose, sucrose, and added sugar intakes were positively associated with mortality, but no association was observed for SSBs. In post-diagnosis analyses, there were marginally significant increases in all-cause mortality with higher intakes of fructose and glucose only. Conclusion: The results of the pooled analysis of meat and egg consumption and breast cancer risk provide some clarification on the inconsistent findings for these associations in individual studies, while the findings of the pooled analysis of 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer risk should be considered in developing public health guidelines on vitamin D. For colorectal cancer survival, future studies should explore pre- and post-diagnosis sugar intake and mortality.

Discuss Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival with other readers

Join or start a book club for Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Nutritional and Lifestyle Factors for Cancer Incidence and Survival with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.