About
"In Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform, Jamie L. Carson and Jason M. Roberts presents an original study of U.S. congressional elections and electoral institutions for 1872-1944 from a contemporary political science perspective. Using data on late nineteenth and early twentieth century congressional elections, the authors test the applicability in a historical contexts of modern political science theories, assess the effects of institutional reforms, and identify the factors that shape the competitiveness of elections. They present several key findings: the strategic politicians theory is applicable in an era without candidate-centered campaigns; there was an incumbency advantage prior to the full development of candidate-centered campaigns; institutional reforms have had a significant effects on elections; and the degree of electoral competition frequently correlates with elected officials' responsiveness to citizens"--Dust cover.

Discuss Ambition, competition, and electoral reform with other readers

Join or start a book club for Ambition, competition, and electoral reform on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Ambition, competition, and electoral reform?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Ambition, competition, and electoral reform as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Ambition, competition, and electoral reform with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Ambition, competition, and electoral reform with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.