Chronologia. Hoc est, omnium temporum et annorum ab initio mundi, usque ad annum a nato Christo, 1552. In prima editione ab autore deducta : post ab eorum recognita, aucta & in annum 1566

Full title: Chronologia. Hoc est, omnium temporum et annorum ab initio mundi, usque ad annum a nato Christo, 1552. In prima editione ab autore deducta: post ab eorum recognita, aucta & in annum 1566: Inde vero ab aliis in annum 1578: & tandem iterum ab aliis usq[ue]; ad annum Christi 1601 producta Computatio. In qua methodice enumerantur omnium populorum, regnorumque memorabilium origins ac successiones. Item. Omnes eorum reges. Quando quisque coeperit. Quamdiu regnarit, quid dignum memoria gesserit, Quis status populi Dei fuerit: ac quemadmodum translata sint Imperia, a populo in populum &c. Et si qui viri illustres, quæ facinora egregia, ac si quid amplius memoratu dignum extitit, ea omnia breviter suis locis referuntur. Suntq[ue] in hac computatione omnia tempora, tum ex sacris Bibliis, tum ex optimis quibusq[ue], autoribus, Historicis & Astronomorum observationibus, summa fide ac diligentia conciliata. Item commentatorium libri decem in quibus quid tradatur, proprio titulo indicator. Autore Iohanne Funccio Nörimbergense. Acceßit etiam præter rerum ac verborum memorabilium Indicem copiosissimum, & denuo locupletatum, Commentariorum quædam appendix, ab aliis adiecta.

Thick folio. pp. [12], 10, ff. 11-173 (i.e. 176), pp. [70]; ff. [138] Signatures: )(6 A-Ll6 Mm4 A-Z6. Contemporary vellum with a few chips, three of four ties gone. Title page in red and black with light stains and small 19th-century stamps (recto-verso) of a convent library at Frauenburg (Frombork) in Poland, where Copernicus observed, wrote, and died.

Enlarged and updated (from 1552 to 1600) edition of Funck’s pioneering world annals (1545-1552 and 1554), which discredited the authority of the Annian ‘Metasthenes,’ but not that of ‘Berosus,’ who is named among his sources as providing ‘the most approved history of the Babylonians’ – thus effectively demonstrating that ‘technical methods of a strikingly modern kind could coexist with an equally striking credulity’ (A. Grafton, Defenders of the text: the traditions of scholarship in an age of science, 1450-1800. Cambridge (MA), 1991, pp. 97-98). This is the edition (1601) of Funck cited by Grafton in notes 73-75 at p. 273, though he appears to have thought the ‘Commentarium in praecedentem chronologiam libri decem‘’ (Part II of the Chronologia, though separately titled and signed) an independent work, which it is not. His later notices of Funck in his Scaliger (espially Joseph Scaliger. A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, Oxford & New York, 1993, II, p. 310 n39) correct that misapprehension.

Click here to view the Johns Hopkins University catalog record.