Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty

Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty

by Owen Anderson, Michael D. Breidenbach

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
"In 1789, when the First Federal Congress discussed James Madison's proposed constitutional amendments on religious liberty and non-establishment, the lawmakers did not debate many of the concerns related to the First Amendment today. They did not argue over whether religious imagery should be excluded from civic spaces, or whether government should refrain from funding activities that include a religious purpose, or whether religion should be separated from politics generally. To these issues, most of the American founders had already replied with a resounding "no." Instead, the question during that sweltering summer in 1789 was more narrowly conceived: What juridical prohibitions should be placed on the federal legislature with respect to a national church and religious conscience, liberty, or exercise? After a month of deliberations, Congress agreed on the following text: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The First Amendment is such contested territory because it relates to fundamental questions about the nature of humanity, morality, religion, government, and God. When these questions are renewed, or when novel answers are offered, changes in societal views on the content and parameters of religious liberty often follow. First Amendment cases often appear at times when fundamental values seem to be in tension. For instance, the first landmark Supreme Court decision on the free exercise clause, Reynolds v. United States (1879), concerned whether a federal law criminalizing plural marriage violated the religious liberty of a Mormon who considered polygamy his religious duty. Divergent views of sexual morality continue to ignite conflicts concerning religious liberty. Recent cases across the United States, including Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018), have considered whether those who provide services for weddings can lawfully deny, on religious liberty grounds, those services for ceremonies celebrating same-sex unions"--

Discuss Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty with other readers

Join or start a book club for Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.