Leading legal disruption

Leading legal disruption

by Aviv Gaon, Carole Piovesan, Giuseppina D'Agostino

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
Establishing liability for damages caused by AI used to be rather straightforward when only one or few stakeholders are involved, or when the AI could only take a limited range of pre-defined decisions in accordance with specific parameters defined by a human programmer. However, AI usually involves several stakeholders and components (e.g. sensors and hardware, softwares and applications, data itself and data services, connectivity features) and recent forms of AI are increasingly able to learn without human supervision which makes it difficult to allocate liability between all stakeholders. This contributions maps various possibilities, identify their challenges and explore lines of thought to develop new solutions or close the gaps, the whole from a global perspective. Existing liability regimes already offer basic protection of victims, to the extent that specific characteristics of emerging technologies are taken into account. Consequently, instead of considering new liability principles (solutions that require certain amendments of the current liability regimes), one should consider simply adapting current fault-based liability regimes with enhanced duties of care and precisions regarding shared liability and solidarity between tortfeasors, which could potentially be done through case-law in most jurisdictions. When it comes to the calculation of damages, given the difficulties in calculating the damage and to take into account the specificities of IPR or privacy rights, economic methods may be considered to calculate the damages in general, such as the Discounted Cash Flow Method (DCF) and the Financial Indicative Running Royalty Model (FIRRM), as well as the Royalty Rate Method and case-law about Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory license terms (FRAND). This path will lead to a certain "flat-rating"damages ("bare misation" or "forfaitisation"), at least when IPR and personal data are illegally used by AI-tools and mostly not visible, hence barely quantifiable in terms of damages. --

Discuss Leading legal disruption with other readers

Join or start a book club for Leading legal disruption on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Leading legal disruption?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Leading legal disruption as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Leading legal disruption with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Leading legal disruption with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.