Was NAFTA necessary?

Was NAFTA necessary?

by Noel Maurer, Harvard Business School. Division of Research

Part of Working paper / Division of Research, Harvard Business School -- 06-043

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
Mexico signed NAFTA in 1994. NAFTA's primary importance was not in providing market access to the United States. Rather, its primary importance was in providing investor protections to foreign direct investment. NAFTA succeeded in its instrumental goal of increasing foreign direct investment. Increased FDI, however, was limited mostly to manufacturing and has had relatively little impact on the bulk of the economy. Without reforms in the finance and energy sectors, and greater security of property rights for domestic investors, Mexico will be doomed to continuing subpar economic performance.

Discuss Was NAFTA necessary? with other readers

Join or start a book club for Was NAFTA necessary? on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Was NAFTA necessary??

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Was NAFTA necessary? as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Was NAFTA necessary? with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Was NAFTA necessary? with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.