Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience

Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience

by Alexander Blair

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
"The Old Testament Torah and Prophets recount the history of an Israel understanding the essence of each person to be the sum of its interactive thus essence-creating social roles, such as citizen, parent, or employee. In contrast the European world has developed a culture described by Plato as emanating from the Logos but actually directed from its upper class. Each individual was to fill its logos-determined place in the social order, in contrast to Israel's God delegating responsibility to the human community (Genesis 1:27) for itself continuously creating its interactive social structure, its culture. In 325 BC Greece colonized the Near East and pressured the Jewish leaders to reinterpret their scriptures as static rules from above rather than interactive resource for learning from past experience. The Jewish reformer Jesus of Nazareth urged the people to maintain their interactive tradition, which caused his elimination by the colonial authorities. The New Testament recounting of this restorative movement puts its current issues in creative internal interaction with Old-Testament-described events on average more frequently than once every two New Testament verses. However, neo-Platonic Christian theologians Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Tillich, and Rahner misunderstood the Old Testament and Jesus' embrace of it, and nineteenth- and twentieth-century theologians Schleiermacher, Harnack, and Bultmann explicitly rejected it. In the 1960s, scholars Eichrodt and Von Rad rediscovered the Old Testament-proclaimed bilateral internal interaction between God and the community. And by the late twentieth century, Europeans Metz and Chauvet and Latin-Americans Gutierrez and Secundo offered a thoroughly interactive Christian theology. Can European and North American Christianity understand its New Testament? Before 1832 peasants could, theologians couldn't. After 1832 some theologians can, most middle-class consumers can't, most politicians don't want to, while most Africans and mestizo Latin Americans implicitly always did."--Cover, p. 4.

Discuss Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience with other readers

Join or start a book club for Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Christian Ambivalence Toward Its Old Testament Interactive Creativity Versus Static Obedience with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.