Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice

by Irene Hames

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
This comprehensive yet concise book provides a thorough and complete guide to every aspect of managing the peer review process for scientific journals. Until now, little information has been readily available on how this important facet of the journal publishing process should be conducted properly. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals fills this gap and provides clear guidance on all aspects of peer review, from manuscript submission to final decision. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals is an essential reference for science journal editors, editorial office staff and publishers. It is an invaluable handbook for the set-up of new Editorial Offices, as well as a useful reference for well-established journals which may need guidance on a particular situation, or may want to review their current practices. Although intended primarily for journals in science, much of its content will be relevant to other scholarly areas. ?This wonderful work by Dr. Hames can be used as a textbook in courses for both experienced and novice editors, and I trust that it is what Dr. Hames intended when she prepared this beautiful book. Every scientific editor should read it.? Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professionals, 2008 This book is co-published with the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) (www.alpsp.org) ALPSP members are entitled to a 30% discount on this book.

Discussion questions for Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice

Bring these to your book club — or discuss them with readers on Readfeed.

  1. 1

    How does Hames frame the fundamental ethical responsibilities of peer reviewers and editors, and how do these duties uphold the integrity of scientific literature?

  2. 2

    In an era of rapid digital publishing and preprint servers, how do traditional peer review models as outlined by Hames adapt to modern pressures for speed in science?

  3. 3

    Consider a time when you received harsh or subjective feedback on your own writing or work; how does Hames’s guidance on managing author-reviewer conflicts resonate with your personal experiences?

Discuss Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice with other readers

Join or start a book club for Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals Guidelines for Good Practice with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.