Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection

Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection

by Athanasios Papanicolaou

2007

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the hydraulic performance of riprap spurs and weirs in controlling bank erosion at the Southern part of the Raccoon River upstream U.S. Highway 169 Bridge utilizing the commercially available model FESWMS and field monitoring. It was found based on a 2 year monitoring and numerical modeling that the design of structures was overall successful, including their spacing and stability. The riprap material incorporated into the structures was directly and favorably correlated to the flow transmission through the structure, or in other words, dictated the permeable nature of the structure. It was found that the permeable dikes and weirs chosen in this study created less volume of scour in the vicinity of the structure toes and thus have less risk comparatively to other impermeable structures to collapse. The fact that the structures permitted the transmission of flow through them it allowed fine sand particles to fill in the gaps of the rock interstices and thus cement and better stabilize the structures. During bank-full flows the maximum scour hole was recorded away from the structures toe and the scour-hole size was directly related to the protrusion angle of the structure to the flow. It was concluded that the proposed inclination with respect to the main flow direction was appropriate since it provides maximum bank protection while creating the largest volume of local scour away from the structure and towards the center of the channel. Furthermore, the lowest potential for bank erosion also occurs with the present set-up design chosen by the IDOT. About 2 ft of new material was deposited in the area located between the structures for the period extending from the construction day to May 2007. Surveys obtained by sonar and the presence of vegetation indicate that new material has been added at the bank toes. Finally, the structures provided higher variability in bed topography forming resting pools, creating flow shade on the leeward side of the structure, and separation of bed substrate due to different flow conditions. Another notable environmental benefit to rock riprap weirs and dikes is the creation of resting pools, especially in year 2007 (2nd year of the project.) The magnitude of these benefits to aquatic habitat has been found in the literature that is directly related to the induced scour-hole volume.

Discuss Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection with other readers

Join or start a book club for Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.