Actuarial Injustice

Actuarial Injustice

by Julie Ciccolini

Browse books you can read free on Readfeed

No club is reading this yet — be the first to start one

Start a club free
About
The actuarial justice movement has propagated an unprecedented increase in the use of crime prediction software in the criminal justice system. Specifically, two forms of crime prediction software - predictive policing and risk assessment instruments – are now informing high-stakes police and judicial decisions that have direct consequences on individual’s civil rights. While advocates claim that the software can alleviate human biases in the system, critics believe it may actually exacerbate them. Due to the conflicting definitions of fairness across legal, technical, and statistical disciplines, there has been no consensus on the software’s potential for discrimination. In order to demonstrate how discrimination can manifest in crime prediction software, I examined a risk assessment instrument designed to predict pretrial felony rearrest for racial discrimination. The instrument is currently used in New York City and to date, has never been independently reviewed. I found that while the instrument demonstrates acceptable predictive validity for all racial subgroups, black defendants receive significantly higher scores on average than white defendants. Although there were small effect sizes, these differences may transcend into discrimination via disparate impact. Most noteworthy, I discovered that only one of the eight predictor variables in the model - whether or not a defendant had any prior arrests - was significantly predictive of future re-arrest. In fact, a redesigned model that predicts rearrest based solely on a defendant’s number of prior arrests performed just as well as the original model. These findings indicate that crime prediction software that utilizes police-generated data to predict police-dependent outcomes is ultimately predicting police activity, not crime. I proffer that this problem is related to the outcome variable at hand and cannot be sufficiently minimized by data manipulation. Therefore, the police and judicial biases that have always plagued America’s criminal justice system will be paralleled in crime prediction software.

Discuss Actuarial Injustice with other readers

Join or start a book club for Actuarial Injustice on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Actuarial Injustice?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Actuarial Injustice as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Actuarial Injustice with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Actuarial Injustice with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.